Which statement about Theft Insurance is NOT true?

The statement regarding Burglary Insurance not requiring evidence of force is not true. Burglary Insurance is specifically designed to cover losses that occur as a result of a burglary, which involves unlawful entry into a property by force. The key distinction with burglary is that there must be visible signs of forced entry to qualify for a claim. This is in direct contrast to theft, where property can be taken without any forcible entry or signs of struggle.

The other statements highlight accurate aspects of theft-related insurance. Theft Insurance is generally considered to cover a wide range of theft scenarios, which makes it broad in coverage compared to other types of specific insurances. Robbery Insurance typically focuses on covering the loss of money, securities, and valuable items, especially during confrontational thefts. Safe Burglary Insurance, meanwhile, does indeed require visible signs of force being used, confirming that the theft was conducted unlawfully through forced entry. Understanding these nuances helps clarify the definitions and operations of different insurance policies related to theft.