What could an occupier of a property potentially be liable for regarding a trespasser?

An occupier of a property has a responsibility to ensure a reasonable level of safety for individuals who may enter their property, even if those individuals are trespassers. When considering the liability regarding a trespasser, a key aspect is the duty of care that the occupier may owe under certain circumstances.

If an occupier fails to point out unusual dangers on the property, they may be held liable if a trespasser gets injured as a result of those dangers. This is particularly true if the occupier had knowledge of the hazards and did not take steps to make them known to the trespasser. The law recognizes that while trespassers may not have the same level of protection as invited guests, an occupier cannot act with gross negligence or malicious intent.

The other options raise ethical and legal concerns regarding how an occupier should treat trespassers. Setting traps to capture or injure individuals deliberately (whether mentioned directly or implied) would go against the principles of responsible property management. Instead, the focus is on the reasonable expectation of safety and the avoidance of willful harm. In essence, the correct answer reflects the notion that occupiers can be liable for failing to prevent wrongful injury through negligence regarding known hazards on their property.